Home
Online Advanced Release
Current Issue
Online-only Articles
Back Issues
Product News
About the Journal
Advertising Info
Contact Us
Article Reprints
Article Submission
Buy a Book
Terms and Conditions
Careers at SLACK Inc.
ISIE
 
  e-contents - sign up today
  Subscribe to this Journal
Get daily Ophthalmic news at the OSN SuperSite

Curbside Consultation in Retina

Clinical Science

A Clinical Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging   Vol. 41   No. 4   July/August 2010
See the Full text
Ozgur Yalcinbayir, MD; Mehmet Baykara, MD; Aydin Atasoy, MD and Hikmet Ozcetin, MD

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the intraocular pressures (IOP) obtained with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and to determine the dependency of both devices on corneal structure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty eyes of 70 patients were included. Cases with corneal pathologies, former glaucoma diagnosis, and systemic diseases were excluded. All eyes underwent measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature. IOP measurements were obtained with GAT and DCT. The agreement of measurements was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The correlation of IOP values obtained with DCT and GAT was statistically significant. The mean DCT values were 0.46 ± 2.55 mm Hg higher than those of GAT, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Bland–Altman plots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between DCT and GAT measurements. GAT readings were significantly affected by CCT, but DCT measurements were affected by age and corneal curvature.

CONCLUSION

DCT is a reliable method of assessing IOP and is less dependent on central corneal thickness. This new technology may be a promising step forward in the management of glaucoma. Further studies are required to validate these observations.

[Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2010;41:437-442.]

AUTHORS

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.

Originally submitted January 2, 2009. Accepted for publication January 4, 2010. Posted online April 29, 2010.

Supported by a grant from the T-2005/8 Investigation Project of Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in the materials presented herein.

Address correspondence to Hikmet Ozcetin, MD, Uludag Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Goz Hast. AD, Gorukle, 16059, Bursa, Turkey.

doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100426-01

See the Full text